ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps Free Test Engine Player Verified Updated [May 03, 2025]
Q&As with Explanations Verified & Correct Answers
The PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification exam covers a wide range of topics related to ISMS, including the principles, concepts, standards, and best practices of information security management. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam also evaluates the candidate's ability to conduct audits, analyze audit results, and recommend corrective actions to improve the effectiveness of ISMS. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification program is designed to provide professionals with the knowledge and skills necessary to identify and manage information security risks, protect against cyber threats, and ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification is a valuable credential for professionals seeking to enhance their career prospects in the field of information security management.
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification is highly respected in the information security industry and is recognized by organizations around the world. It demonstrates that the certified individual has the knowledge and skills to lead and manage an ISMS audit team and can ensure that an organization's information security management system is effective and compliant with the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. With this certification, professionals can enhance their career prospects and contribute to the success of their organization.
NEW QUESTION # 107
Which one option best describes the purpose of retaining documented information related to the Information Security Management System (ISMS) of an organisation?
- A. To show objective evidence to third-party auditors.
- B. To ensure that all workers will follow the established procedure.
- C. To the extent necessary, to have confidence that the processes have been carried out as planned.
- D. To show compliance with legal requirements.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The purpose of retaining documented information related to the ISMS of an organisation is to the extent necessary, to have confidence that the processes have been carried out as planned. This means that the documented information provides evidence of the conformity and effectiveness of the ISMS, as well as the achievement of the information security objectives and the continual improvement of the ISMS. Documented information also supports the analysis and evaluation of the ISMS performance and the identification of opportunities for improvement. References: = ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 7.5.1; PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 17.
NEW QUESTION # 108
A couple of years ago you started your company which has now grown from 1 to 20 employees. Your company's information is worth more and more and gone are the days when you could keep control yourself.
You are aware that you have to take measures, but what should they be? You hire a consultant who advises you to start with a qualitative risk analysis.
What is a qualitative risk analysis?
- A. This analysis is based on scenarios and situations and produces a subjective view of the possible threats.
- B. This analysis follows a precise statistical probability calculation in order to calculate exact loss caused by damage.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 109
What is the standard definition of ISMS?
- A. A project-based approach to achieve business objectives for establishing, implementing, operating, monitoring, reviewing, maintaining and improving an organization's information security
- B. A company wide business objectives to achieve information security awareness for establishing, implementing, operating, monitoring, reviewing, maintaining and improving
- C. A systematic approach for establishing, implementing, operating,monitoring, reviewing, maintaining and improving an organization's information security to achieve business objectives.
- D. Is an information security systematic approach to achieve business objectives for implementation, establishing, reviewing,operating and maintaining organization's reputation.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The standard definition of ISMS is a systematic approach for establishing, implementing, operating, monitoring, reviewing, maintaining and improving an organization's information security to achieve business objectives. This definition is given in clause 3.17 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and it describes the main components and purpose of an ISMS. An ISMS is not a project-based approach, as it is an ongoing process that requires continual improvement. An ISMS is not a company wide business objective, as it is a management system that supports the organization's objectives. An ISMS is not an information security systematic approach, as it is a broader concept that encompasses the organization's context, risks, controls, and performance. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 15. : ISO
/IEC 27001:2022, clause 3.17.
NEW QUESTION # 110
Which department maintain's contacts with law enforcement authorities, regulatory bodies, information service providers and telecommunications service providers depending on the service required.
- A. CISO
- B. COO
- C. CSM
- D. MRO
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The department that maintains contacts with law enforcement authorities, regulatory bodies, information service providers and telecommunications service providers depending on the service required is CISO. CISO stands for Chief Information Security Officer. A CISO is a senior-level executive who is responsible for overseeing the information security strategy and governance of an organization. A CISO also leads the information security function and coordinates with other departments and stakeholders to ensure compliance with laws, regulations and standards related to information security. A CISO may also act as a liaison between the organization and external parties, such as law enforcement authorities or service providers, in case of incidents or investigations involving information security issues. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requires the organization to assign top management roles and responsibilities for ensuring that information security objectives are established and achieved (see clause 5.3). References: CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC
27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is CISO?
NEW QUESTION # 111
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services and are reviewing the Software Code Management (SCM) system. You found a total of 10 user accounts on the SCM.
You confirm that one of the users, Scott, resigned 9-months
ago. The SCM System Administrator confirmed Scott's last check-out of the source code was found 1 month ago. He was using one of the uthorized desktops from the local network in a secure area.
You check with the user de-registration procedure which states "Managers have to make sure of deregistration of the user account and authorisation immediately from the relevant ICT system and/or equipment after resignation approval." There was no deregistration record for user Scott.
The IT Security Manager explains that Scott still comes back to the office every month after he resigned to provide support on source code maintenance. That's why his account on SCM still exists.
You would like to investigate other areas further to collect more audit evidence. Select three options that would not be valid audit trails.
- A. Collect more evidence on how the transition of Scott from full-time to part-time employment was managed (relevant to control A.6.5)
- B. Collect more evidence on where Scott kept the source code that he checked out and how it was secured.
(Relevant to control A.8.4) - C. Collect more evidence from Scott's background verification checks performed by the human resource department under the new employment relationship. (Relevant to control A.6.1)
- D. Collect more evidence on how Scott can access the secure area. (Relevant to control A.8.4)
- E. Collect more evidence on how Scott can access the employee's desktop and local network. (Relevant to control A.5.15)
- F. Collect more evidence on how the organization pays for Scott's source code maintenance support service. (Relevant to control A.6.2)
- G. Collect more evidence of why Scott resigned and whether his re-engagement represents a conflict of interest. (relevant to control A.5.3)
- H. Collect more evidence on how access controls are periodically reviewed to maintain security (Relevant to control A.5.35)
Answer: A,F,G
Explanation:
Explanation
The options B, D, and G are not valid audit trails because they are not directly related to the ISMS requirements or the audit criteria. They are more relevant to the human resource management or the contractual arrangements of the organization, which are outside the scope of the ISMS audit. The other options are valid audit trails because they can provide evidence of how the organization implements and maintains the ISMS controls related to access control, secure areas, and information security aspects of business continuity management. References:
PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 16, section 4.2.1 ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clauses A.5.3, A.5.15, A.5.35, A.6.1, A.6.2, A.6.5, A.8.4, A.17.1 ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.2.2
NEW QUESTION # 112
You are performing an ISMS initial certification audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to conduct the closing meeting. During the final audit team meeting, as an audit team leader, you agree to report 2 minor nonconformities and 1 opportunity for improvement as below:
Select one option of the recommendation to the audit programme manager you are going to advise to the auditee at the closing meeting.
- A. Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months
- B. Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date
- C. Recommend certification immediately
- D. Recommend certification after your approval of the proposed corrective action plan Recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year
- E. Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, clause 9.4.9 requires the certification body to make a certification decision based on the information obtained during the audit and any other relevant information1. The certification body should also consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee to address any nonconformities identified during the audit1. Therefore, when making a recommendation to the audit programme manager, an ISMS auditor should consider the nature and severity of the nonconformities and the proposed corrective actions.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should recommend certification after their approval of the proposed corrective action plan and recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year. The auditor should provide the following justification for their recommendation:
Justification: This recommendation is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has only two minor nonconformities and one opportunity for improvement, which do not indicate a significant or systemic failure of their ISMS. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. An opportunity for improvement is defined as a suggestion for improvement beyond what is required by ISO/IEC 27001:20222. Therefore, these findings do not prevent or preclude certification, as long as they are addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should approve the proposed corrective action plan before recommending certification, to ensure that it is realistic, achievable, and effective. The auditor should also recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year, to verify that the corrective actions have been implemented and are working as intended.
The other options are not valid recommendations for the audit programme manager, as they are either too lenient or too strict for the given scenario. For example:
Recommend certification immediately: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO
19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee before making a certification decision.
Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor overreacts or exaggerates the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC
17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a re-audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A full scope re-audit is usually reserved for major nonconformities or multiple minor nonconformities that indicate a serious or widespread failure of an ISMS.
Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor distrusts or doubts the auditee's commitment or capability to implement corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to conduct unannounced audits only under certain conditions, such as when there are indications of serious problems with an ISMS or when required by sector-specific schemes.
Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor imposes or prescribes a specific time frame or scope for verifying corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a partial audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A partial audit may be appropriate for minor nonconformities, but the time frame and scope should be agreed upon with the auditee and based on the proposed corrective action plan.
References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 113
Please match the following situations to the type of audit required.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation
* Top management requests auditors from the organisation's compliance department to audit the production process in order to ensure the final product meets quality requirements = First-party audit
* Auditors from the buyer's organisation audit their raw material supplier to ensure the supply fulfils the order and contract = Second-party audit
* Auditors from an independent certification body conduct an audit of the organisation to verify conformity with an ISO Standard for certification purposes = Third-party audit
* The organisation has been audited against two management system standards in one audit = Combined audit Explanation: According to the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, there are three main categories of audits: internal, external, and certification1. An internal audit, also known as a first-party audit, is an audit conducted by the organisation itself, or by an external party on its behalf, for management review and other internal purposes12. An external audit, also known as a second-party audit, is an audit conducted by a customer or other interested party on a supplier or contractor to verify compliance with contractual or other requirements12. A certification audit, also known as a third-party audit, is an audit conducted by an independent certification body to verify conformity with an ISO standard for certification purposes12. A combined audit is an audit where two or more management system standards are audited together3.
References: 1: PECB Candidate Handbook - ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 192: ISO 27001 Audit Types and How They are Conducted23: The Four ISO 27001 Audit Categories, Explained4
NEW QUESTION # 114
Scenario 8: EsBank provides banking and financial solutions to the Estonian banking sector since September
2010. The company has a network of 30 branches with over 100 ATMs across the country.
Operating in a highly regulated industry, EsBank must comply with many laws and regulations regarding the security and privacy of data. They need to manage information security across their operations by implementing technical and nontechnical controls. EsBank decided to implement an ISMS based on ISO/IEC
27001 because it provided better security, more risk control, and compliance with key requirements of laws and regulations.
Nine months after the successful implementation of the ISMS, EsBank decided to pursue certification of their ISMS by an independent certification body against ISO/IEC 27001 .The certification audit included all of EsBank's systems, processes, and technologies.
The stage 1 and stage 2 audits were conducted jointly and several nonconformities were detected. The first nonconformity was related to EsBank's labeling of information. The company had an information classification scheme but there was no information labeling procedure. As a result, documents requiring the same level of protection would be labeled differently (sometimes as confidential, other times sensitive).
Considering that all the documents were also stored electronically, the nonconformity also impacted media handling. The audit team used sampling and concluded that 50 of 200 removable media stored sensitive information mistakenly classified as confidential. According to the information classification scheme, confidential information is allowed to be stored in removable media, whereas storing sensitive information is strictly prohibited. This marked the other nonconformity.
They drafted the nonconformity report and discussed the audit conclusions with EsBank's representatives, who agreed to submit an action plan for the detected nonconformities within two months.
EsBank accepted the audit team leader's proposed solution. They resolved the nonconformities by drafting a procedure for information labeling based on the classification scheme for both physical and electronic formats. The removable media procedure was also updated based on this procedure.
Two weeks after the audit completion, EsBank submitted a general action plan. There, they addressed the detected nonconformities and the corrective actions taken, but did not include any details on systems, controls, or operations impacted. The audit team evaluated the action plan and concluded that it would resolve the nonconformities. Yet, EsBank received an unfavorable recommendation for certification.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which action illustrated in scenario 8 is unacceptable in an external audit?
- A. Stage 1 audit and stage 2 audits were performed at the same time
- B. The lack of an information labeling procedure existed was marked as a minor nonconformity
- C. The audit team leader suggested a specific solution on resolving the nonconformities
Answer: C
Explanation:
The audit team leader suggesting a specific solution on resolving the nonconformities is unacceptable in an external audit. This could compromise the impartiality of the audit process by appearing to assist the auditee in corrective actions, which should independently originate from the auditee to ensure the integrity and effectiveness of the ISMS.
NEW QUESTION # 115 
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation
An audit finding is the result of the evaluation of the collected audit evidence against audit criteria.
NEW QUESTION # 116
You are an experienced audit team leader guiding an auditor in training.
Your team is currently conducting a third-party surveillance audit of an organisation that stores data on behalf of external clients. The auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the TECHNOLOGICAL controls listed in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) and implemented at the site.
Select four controls from the following that would you expect the auditor in training to review.
You are an experienced audit team leader guiding an auditor in training, Your team is currently conducting a third-party surveillance audit of an organisation that stores data on behalf of external clients. The auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the TECHNOLOGICAL controls listed in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) and implemented at the site.
Select four controls from the following that would you expect the auditor in training to review.
- A. Rules for transferring information within the organisation and to other organisations
- B. Information security awareness, education and training
- C. How access to source code and development tools are managed
- D. How power and data cables enter the building
- E. Confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements
- F. The organisation's arrangements for maintaining equipment
- G. The organisation's arrangements for information deletion
- H. Access to and from the loading bay
- I. The development and maintenance of an information asset inventory
- J. Remote working arrangements
- K. How protection against malware is implemented
- L. The operation of the site CCTV and door control systems
- M. How information security has been addressed within supplier agreements
- N. The conducting of verification checks on personnel
- O. How the organisation evaluates its exposure to technical vulnerabilities
- P. The organisation's business continuity arrangements
Answer: C,K,L,O
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), an organization should select and implement appropriate controls to achieve its information security objectives1. The controls should be derived from the results of risk assessment and risk treatment, and should be consistent with the Statement of Applicability (SoA), which is a document that identifies the controls that are applicable and necessary for the ISMS1. The controls can be selected from various sources, such as ISO/IEC 27002:2013, which provides a code of practice for information security controls2. Therefore, if an auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the technological controls listed in the SoA and implemented at the site of an organization that stores data on behalf of external clients, four controls that would be expected to review are:
* How protection against malware is implemented: This is a technological control that aims to prevent, detect and remove malicious software (such as viruses, worms, ransomware, etc.) that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information or information systems2. This control is related to control A.12.2.1 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* How the organisation evaluates its exposure to technical vulnerabilities: This is a technological control that aims to identify and assess the potential weaknesses or flaws in information systems or networks that could be exploited by malicious actors or cause accidental failures2. This control is related to control A.12.6.1 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* How access to source code and development tools are managed: This is a technological control that aims to protect the intellectual property rights and integrity of software applications or systems that are developed or maintained by the organization or its external providers2. This control is related to controlA.14.2.5 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
* The operation of the site CCTV and door control systems: This is a technological control that aims to monitor and restrict physical access to the premises or facilities where information or information systems are stored or processed2. This control is related to control A.11.1.4 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
The other options are not examples of technological controls, but rather organizational, legal or procedural controls that may also be relevant for an ISMS audit, but are not within the scope of the auditor in training's task. For example, the development and maintenance of an information asset inventory (related to control A.8.1.1), rules for transferring information within the organization and to other organizations (related to control A.13.2.1), confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements (related to control A.13.2.4), verification checks on personnel (related to control A.7.1.2), remote working arrangements (related to control A.6.2.1), information security within supplier agreements (related to control A.15.1.1), business continuity arrangements (related to control A.17), information deletion (related to control A.8.3), information security awareness, education and training (related to control A.7.2), equipment maintenance (related to control A.11.2), and how power and data cables enter the building (related to control A.11) are not technological controls, but rather organizational, legal or procedural controls that may also be relevant for an ISMS audit, but are not within the scope of the auditor in training's task. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO/IEC
27002:2013 - Information technology - Security techniques - Code of practice for information security controls
NEW QUESTION # 117
Changes on project-managed applications or database should undergo the change control process as documented.
- A. True
- B. False
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 118
During a third-party certification audit you are presented with a list of issues by an auditee. Which four of the following constitute 'external' issues in the context of a management system to ISO/IEC 27001:2022?
- A. A fall in productivity linked to outdated production equipment
- B. A reduction in grants as a result of a change in government policy
- C. Higher labour costs as a result of an aging population
- D. A rise in interest rates in response to high inflation
- E. Inability to source raw materials due to government sanctions
- F. Poor levels of staff competence as a result of cuts in training expenditure
- G. Poor morale as a result of staff holidays being reduced
- H. Increased absenteeism as a result of poor management
Answer: B,C,D,E
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 4.1 requires an organization to determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that affect its ability to achieve the intended outcomes of its ISMS2. External issues are those that originate from outside the organization, such as legal, regulatory, cultural, social, political, economic, natural and competitive factors2. Internal issues are those that originate from within the organization, such as governance, structure, roles and responsibilities, policies, objectives, culture, capabilities, resources and information systems2. Therefore, based on this definition, four examples of external issues in the context of a management system to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 are a rise in interest rates in response to high inflation (which affects the economic environment of the organization), a reduction in grants as a result of a change in government policy (which affects the political and legal environment of the organization), higher labour costs as a result of an aging population (which affects the social and demographic environment of the organization), and inability to source raw materials due to government sanctions (which affects the trade and supply environment of the organization)2. The other options are examples of internal issues, as they originate from within the organization or its activities. For example, poor levels of staff competence as a result of cuts in training expenditure (which affects the capabilities and resources of the organization), increased absenteeism as a result of poor management (which affects the culture and performance of the organization), poor morale as a result of staff holidays being reduced (which affects the motivation and satisfaction of the organization's personnel), and a fall in productivity linked to outdated production equipment (which affects the efficiency and quality of the organization's processes)2. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 119
Which one of the following options is the definition of an interested party?
- A. An individual or organisation that can control, be controlled by, or perceive itself to be controlled by a decision or activity
- B. A group or organisation that can interfere in or perceive itself to be interfered with by a management decision
- C. A third party can appeal to an organisation when it perceives itself to be affected by a decision or activity
- D. A person or organisation that can affect, be affected by or perceive itself to be affected by a decision or activity
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
This is the definition of an interested party according to ISO 27001:2013, clause 3.16. An interested party is essentially a stakeholder, i.e., a person or organization that can influence or be influenced by the information security management system (ISMS) or its activities. Interested parties can have different needs and expectations regarding the ISMS, and these should be identified and addressed by the organization.
References:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 3.16 PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 10 Identifying interested parties and their expectations for an ISO 27001 ISMS Examples of ISO 27001 interested parties
NEW QUESTION # 120
You are an experienced audit team leader guiding an auditor in training, Your team is currently conducting a third-party surveillance audit of an organisation that stores data on behalf of external clients. The auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the TECHNOLOGICAL controls listed in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) and implemented at the site.
Select four controls from the following that would you expect the auditor in training to review.
- A. Rules for transferring information within the organisation and to other organisations
- B. Information security awareness, education and training
- C. How access to source code and development tools are managed
- D. How power and data cables enter the building
- E. Confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements
- F. The organisation's arrangements for maintaining equipment
- G. The organisation's arrangements for information deletion
- H. Access to and from the loading bay
- I. The development and maintenance of an information asset inventory
- J. Remote working arrangements
- K. How protection against malware is implemented
- L. The operation of the site CCTV and door control systems
- M. How information security has been addressed within supplier agreements
- N. The conducting of verification checks on personnel
- O. How the organisation evaluates its exposure to technical vulnerabilities
- P. The organisation's business continuity arrangements
Answer: C,K,L,O
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), an organization should select and implement appropriate controls to achieve its information security objectives1. The controls should be derived from the results of risk assessment and risk treatment, and should be consistent with the Statement of Applicability (SoA), which is a document that identifies the controls that are applicable and necessary for the ISMS1. The controls can be selected from various sources, such as ISO/IEC 27002:2013, which provides a code of practice for information security controls2. Therefore, if an auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the technological controls listed in the SoA and implemented at the site of an organization that stores data on behalf of external clients, four controls that would be expected to review are:
How protection against malware is implemented: This is a technological control that aims to prevent, detect and remove malicious software (such as viruses, worms, ransomware, etc.) that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information or information systems2. This control is related to control A.12.2.1 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
How the organisation evaluates its exposure to technical vulnerabilities: This is a technological control that aims to identify and assess the potential weaknesses or flaws in information systems or networks that could be exploited by malicious actors or cause accidental failures2. This control is related to control A.12.6.1 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
How access to source code and development tools are managed: This is a technological control that aims to protect the intellectual property rights and integrity of software applications or systems that are developed or maintained by the organization or its external providers2. This control is related to control A.14.2.5 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
The operation of the site CCTV and door control systems: This is a technological control that aims to monitor and restrict physical access to the premises or facilities where information or information systems are stored or processed2. This control is related to control A.11.1.4 of ISO/IEC 27002:20132.
The other options are not examples of technological controls, but rather organizational, legal or procedural controls that may also be relevant for an ISMS audit, but are not within the scope of the auditor in training's task. For example, the development and maintenance of an information asset inventory (related to control A.8.1.1), rules for transferring information within the organization and to other organizations (related to control A.13.2.1), confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements (related to control A.13.2.4), verification checks on personnel (related to control A.7.1.2), remote working arrangements (related to control A.6.2.1), information security within supplier agreements (related to control A.15.1.1), business continuity arrangements (related to control A.17), information deletion (related to control A.8.3), information security awareness, education and training (related to control A.7.2), equipment maintenance (related to control
A.11.2), and how power and data cables enter the building (related to control A.11) are not technological controls, but rather organizational, legal or procedural controls that may also be relevant for an ISMS audit, but are not within the scope of the auditor in training's task. References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, ISO/IEC
27002:2013 - Information technology - Security techniques - Code of practice for information security controls
NEW QUESTION # 121
Which is not a requirement of HR prior to hiring?
- A. Must undergo Awareness training on information security.
- B. Must successfully pass Background Investigation
- C. Applicant must complete pre-employment documentation requirements
- D. Undergo background verification
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 122
......
Verified ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps Q&As Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Download: https://www.easy4engine.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-test-engine.html
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps with Free 365 Days Update Fast Exam Updates: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nDUWYGMUM_r1kn2UXYVMWaWQ2loOM37v
